Throughout North's article, I get the idea that he wants everyone to realize that a writing center isn't a place students should go to for someone to do their paper for them. Instead, the writing center should be used as a tool for students to help better themselves so they can become better writers. One specific instance that stood out to me came on page 441 when North presents a typical remark from someone who uses the writing center. In this remark, the person says that even after the visit to the writing center, their paper was still full of errors. North goes on to say, "The axiom, if you will recall, is that we aim to make better writers, not necessarily-or immediately- better text." This helped me more understand what a writer tutor should want to be, but at the same time raises the question: Do students who come into the writing center want to become better writers, or do they simply want better texts?
While reading Kenneth Bruffee's article, "Collaborative Learning and the 'Conversation of Mankind,'" I realized how much conversation can help someone learn. Bruffee sites some writers, including Michael Oakshott. Oakshott relates conversation to reflective thought by saying human conversation is the external action for reflective thought. So, in my terms, people are constantly having conversations, either with themselves or with others. He goes on to explain how when people think, they have internal conversations. So, when people talk with other people, they are basically externally thinking. This idea could play a bug role in the writing center because when a student comes in they may not have any more idea about the paper their writing. So, as writing tutors it becomes our job to give the student the ability to use us another way of thinking.
No comments:
Post a Comment